livrenum:critique_of_information
Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
Prochaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
livrenum:critique_of_information [2016/11/01 11:08] – créée tom | livrenum:critique_of_information [2018/02/15 13:57] (Version actuelle) – modification externe 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Ligne 1: | Ligne 1: | ||
- | * ** Critique of Information | + | |
+ | |||
+ | * __Référence__ : LASH, Scott, | ||
+ | * __Thèmes__ : Introduction et Guide en Digital Media | ||
+ | * __Mots-clés__ | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | * __Compte rendu existant__ : GOLUMBIA, David, " | ||
+ | * __Description existante__ : "This penetrating book raises questions about how power operates in contemporary society. It explains how the speed of information flows has eroded the separate space needed for critical reflection. It argues that there is no longer an ' | ||
- | *__Intérêt__ : | ||
- | *__Extraits__ : « », p. | ||
- | *__Mots-clés__ : | ||
- | *__En rapport avec les articles__ : | ||
- | *__Œuvres d’intérêt potentiel__ : | ||
- | "Among the works closest in spirit to that of the original critical theorists with direct | ||
- | application to digital media is Critique of Information (2002) by the Goldsmiths sociologist | ||
- | and cultural theorist Scott Lash. Lash expands on the notion of ideology critique associated | ||
- | with the Frankfurt School to a notion appropriate for the digital age which he | ||
- | calls informationcritique. Lash notes the existence of two modes of critique: fifirst, “the | ||
- | critique of the par tic u lar through the universal . . . the sort of critique we have in Habermas, | ||
- | in which the particularism of ‘strategic rationality’ is criticized from the universalism | ||
- | of communicative rationality” (2002, 6), a critique that Lash suggests “is diffifficult in | ||
- | the information age because of the very speed and immediacy of sociocultural pro cesses.” | ||
- | Second, “the more widespread notion of critique, | ||
- | couple itself,” which “rejects propositional logic as the space of ‘the same,’ and | ||
- | operates instead from a critical space of ‘the other.’ ” Rejecting such dualisms even further, | ||
- | Lash writes that the “ ‘out there’ and ‘in here’ no longer make sense in the information | ||
- | age’s Nietz schean problematics of immanence”; | ||
- | critique itself must become informational. . . . With the disappearance of a | ||
- | constitutive outside, informationcritique must be inside of information. Critique, and | ||
- | the texts of Critical Theory, must be part and parcel of this general informationalization” | ||
- | (2002, 10). Lash’s is the most abstract of recent extensions of critical theoretical methods | ||
- | into the world of the digital." |
livrenum/critique_of_information.1478012890.txt.gz · Dernière modification : 2018/02/15 13:56 (modification externe)